Confiscation at international level
At international level there are several instruments promoting the confiscation of criminal proceeds. The real milestone in promoting the confiscation of criminal proceeds is the 1990 Strasbourg Convention, which has been ratified by all 27 EU Member States. It seeks to promote international cooperation in the identification, tracing, freezing and confiscation of criminal assets. This Convention has been supplemented and updated by the Second Strasbourg Convention.
Confiscation in the European Union
The European Union has long proclaimed the importance of confiscation of criminal proceeds. To ensure a common approach to confiscation within the EU, several EU legislative instruments were adopted in the past years. The EU now focuses on the proper implementation of these instruments at national level.
- The Framework Decision on freezing and confiscation of proceeds from crime was adopted in 2001. The purpose was to ensure a common minimum approach of Member States in terms of those criminal offences for which they should provide for confiscation. The general rule is that if an offence is punishable by imprisonment of a maximum of more than one year, it must be possible under national law to order confiscation of proceeds generated by that offence. The Member States are required to have in place a system of value confiscation. All requests coming from other Member States must be processed with the same priority as is given to such measures in purely domestic proceedings.
- The Framework Decision on Confiscation of 2005 seeks to ensure an additional degree of approximation of Member States' law on criminal confiscation.
- The Framework Decision on Mutual Recognition of Confiscation Orders establishes the rules according to which the judicial authorities of one Member State will recognise and execute a confiscation order in its territory issued by competent judicial authorities of another Member State. The value of confiscated property will be shared equally between the issuing and executing State.
- The confiscation order is frequently preceded by the freezing of assets. To allow competent judicial authorities to seize property on request of another Member State's judicial authorities the Framework Decision on freezing property or evidence was adopted in 2003 (see also the section on Freezing of assets and evidence).
- To make the practical cooperation between the judicial authorities effective, the Council Decision on Asset Recovery Offices seeks to build on the informal cooperation, which has taken place among Member State contact points working in the area of criminal asset identification, tracing and recovery in the CARIN network. This Decision requires Member States to establish or designate "Asset Recovery Offices", whose function is to facilitate effective cooperation and exchange of information in the asset recovery area.
- In 2014, a Directive was adopted to make it easier for EU states to confiscate assets derived from serious and organised crime..The Directive aims at simplifying the existing rules and to fill important gaps which are being exploited by organised crime groups. It will enhance the ability of EU states to confiscate assets that have been transferred to third parties, it will make it easier to confiscate criminal assets even when the suspect has fled and will ensure that competent authorities can temporarily freeze assets that risk disappearing if no action is taken.
This page is maintained by the European Commission. The information on this page does not necessarily reflect the official position of the European Commission. The Commission accepts no responsibility or liability whatsoever with regard to any information or data contained or referred to in this document. Please refer to the legal notice with regard to copyright rules for European pages.
The Commission is in the process of updating some of the content on this website in the light of the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union. If the site contains content that does not yet reflect the withdrawal of the United Kingdom, it is unintentional and will be addressed.